Who is Controlling Whom?
Here is piece taken from a Newsweek article:
"There are ominous signs that the Earthís weather patterns have begun to change dramatically - with serious political implications for just about every nation on Earth.
The evidence in support of these predictions has now begun to accumulate so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it."
The only thing is, that article isnít current. Itís from 1975.
And it wasnít about global warming, it was about global cooling.
"It is the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion." Joseph Paul Goebbels
"What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolf Hitler - (1889-1945) German Nazi Dictator
"Propaganda should be popular, not intellectually pleasing. It is not the task of propaganda to discover intellectual truths". Joseph Goebbels(09/01/1928)
"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State."
Dec 14, 2010, 11:59
Treachery and Greenery
Environmentalism has begun to splinter. Is nuclear power a good thing or a bad thing? What does the Green lobby think? Do they all think the same? Does it matter?
Jun 26, 2007, 20:05
The Vision Of The Anointed
Are the Greens "The Anointed Ones"? After reading this essay you may very well think so!
Can you think of an organisation that proposes a dramatic crisis that requires solving even before we have conclusive evidence that the problem exists? Can you think of an organisation that insists on soaking up New Zealand wealth and energy solving the unsolveable?
Who proposed that the world is getting warmer because of humans burning fossil fuels? Have you ever tried to find the evidence for this? Did you know that the certain costs of the Kyoto Protocol (around $150,000,000,000 per year) will only, maybe, delay the earth warming by 0.15 degrees centigrade by 2100?
When we read of elderly dying of the cold in some climates would not a bit of warming be a GOOD thing? We have had many "ice-ages" in the past few million years. Doesn't this mean that the earth is always warming up or cooling down? Wouldn't it be surprising if the earth was always exactly the same temperature century after century?
How accurately can we measure the temperature? Where should we take the earth's temperature? With ice-ages taking 10s of thousands of years to wax and wane how can we expect to measure a change over 10 or 20 years?
The proposition of Global Warming raises more questions than it answers yet we are preparing to lower our growth rate significantly and suffer economic hardship now, in the hope of (maybe) making the earth 0.15 degrees colder in a hundred years. Are we mad?
If we concentrate on boosting our growth rate we will leave our descendants a wealthy country far more able to solve the problems of their time than if we limit growth and leave them a miserable third world Pacific Island.
Oct 18, 2004, 18:08
Green Power - Black Death
The Greens spend a lot of time and money telling us how they saved the Earth. What they don't tell you is how many people are dying because of Green policies.
You may have heard of Golden Rice which was produced because millions of people are dying because of vitamin A deficiency and ordinary rice is deficient in vitamin A. If the poor rice eating countries of the world would only grow Golden Rice then this vitamin A deficiency would be "cured".
Unfortunately Greenies are insisting that these people die. Because this rice was developed using GE techniques they won't let people get access to it. What sort of people are the Greens? Find out more . . .
[ Visit Website ]
Sep 27, 2004, 15:37
Are the Greens Mad or Bad?
The Greens claim to be the great supporters of the environment and one of their major achievements is the banning of the use of DDT. As a consequence of their actions millions of people die each year.
Can this be true, and if it is true then why don't the Greens move heaven and earth to save these people and reduce human suffering on earth? Are they really mad or bad or are they just misguided? The result is still the same.
Sep 27, 2004, 15:10